A while back I read a short piece in The Toronto Star on some fascinating scientific research.* The researchers – from Harvard and MIT – had wanted to find out if an analytical model that was originally designed to track the proliferation of contagious diseases could also track the spread of emotions like happiness and sadness. To make a long story short (and undoubtedly sacrifice a little accuracy in the process!) in order to do this they collected data on the moods of both patients and the people around them that had originally been amassed in an extensive, long-term study on heart disease. They then plugged this data into a program that was designed to predict and trace the spread of infectious disease. In the end, according to The Star, the researchers not only found that they could track the spread of emotions, they also discovered “a correlation between an individual’s emotional state and those of the person’s contacts…In other words, it appears that you can catch happiness. Or sadness.”
Reading this helped clarify a feeling I’ve had for a long time whenever I get involved in a conversation about how “bad” things are – global warming, ozone depletion, the recession, the horrors of the recent oil spill…. Every time I’m in one of these discussions I feel like there is a black cloud emanating out of me and everyone involved, and I have this awful sense that the conversation is, in itself, somehow making the situation worse.
Let me make it clear that I am not talking about informed, intelligent discussion about disasters and terrible situations that is aimed at spreading important information or – especially – fostering urgent action that needs to be taken!!!
I am talking about a kind of re-hashing of how bad things are – particularly when the listing of horrors is being used as a sort of ‘proof’ that the Armageddon thought to be predicted by the things like the Mayan Calendar is definitely on its way.
We certainly need to keep important information about the horrors in the world flowing – the way amazing organizations like Avaaz.org do. We need to take action – and keep taking action. But we also need to catch ourselves when what we are doing is, in fact, not spreading important information or encouraging activism, but allowing ourselves to sink into – and spread – despair. [As an aside, let me say that I can’t for the life of me figure out why some people seem to be perversely pleased that Nostradamus-type predictions for disaster appear to be coming true!!]
While Gopi Krishna was one of the great visionaries who made these types of predictions, he also made it clear that the coming of this disaster was not inevitable and that “Armageddon” was not an absolute foregone conclusion. There was a cosmic scale that could be tipped. A sufficient manifestation of the divine love – he would have said kundalini-shakti – could not only generate the light and love that would balance out the darkness, but could also foster the level of enlightenment that would, in turn, provide divinely inspired solutions to the world’s problems.
In the meantime, let us – trite as it may sound – focus on the positive. Spread the love, the light, the hope…. As that corny, but wonderful, Johnny Mercer song from the 1940s puts it:
You’ve got to ac-cen-tu-ate the positive
Eliminate the negative
And latch on to the affirmative
Don’t mess with Mister In-Between…
You’ve got to spread joy up to the maximum
Bring gloom down to the minimum
Have faith or pandemonium’s
Liable to walk upon the scene….
*The piece printed in The Toronto Star was written by Rachel Bernstein and originally published in the Los Angeles Times. The original article describing the research can be found in Proceedings of the Royal Science B. I’ll be checking this out and seeing if there is anything else of interest to be gleaned from this research.